In the DeFi ecosystem, this highly concentrated token distribution is often associated with potential "pump and dump" strategies. The community believes that if you are a liquidity provider (LP) or an investor holding a large amount of $AB, you should be highly alert to potential price risks and technical collapses.
What Justifies 1.5 Billion FDV? Valuation Bubble and the Gap in Application Landing
Currently, AB's fully diluted valuation (FDV) is as high as 1.5 billion US dollars, which is compared to projects with extensive applications and market recognition, such as $INJ, $LIDO, and $CAKE. Critics question: "Does a chain with unclear utility and popularity qualify to stand at the same valuation level as these mature DeFi projects?"
Although AB's narrative focuses on RWA on-chain and cross-chain technology, there is currently no evidence of large-scale deployment or ecosystem applications. Looking at it now, such a high valuation might just be a false prosperity, and it may become the fuse that crushes market confidence and triggers a severe market crash.
Listing on Major Exchanges within Six Months: Is AB a Disruptive Innovation or a Leek Harvesting Machine?
In the crypto market, narrative and landing often have a huge gap. While AB's RWA integration vision is attractive, from the perspectives of team transparency, token distribution structure, and valuation basis, the doubts seem to outnumber the selling points.
When the community has begun to issue warnings about the "next collapsed coin" and the project side has not responded for a long time, the true value of $AB may only be seen most clearly by those who carry the sedan chair to the end.
Risk Warning
Cryptocurrency investment carries high risks, and its price may fluctuate dramatically. You may lose all your principal. Please carefully assess the risks.
Behind the eye-catching market value growth and decentralization ideals, the cryptocurrency market is facing an underestimated systemic risk: "liquidity illusion". This has long existed in traditional financial markets, and cryptocurrencies have not solved it. Now, across fragmented chains and exchanges, this play has become more difficult to end, making cryptocurrencies harder to become mainstream.
Table of Contents
ToggleThe Dream of Decentralization, Unable to Support Fragmented Liquidity
The crypto market capitalization has now reached 3.4 trillion US dollars, estimated to double to 5.73 trillion by 2033. However, B2 Ventures founder Arthur Azizov points out that this growth wave masks a core problem: "The market depth is extremely fragile".
Taking the foreign exchange market as an example, he emphasizes that even with a global daily trading volume of 7.5 trillion US dollars, mainstream currency pairs like EUR/USD often experience slippage and liquidity gaps:
The crypto market is no exception. When market sentiment turns cold, once-active order books instantly dry up, and selling pressure will surge like an avalanche.
The Lesson Taught by ETF: Packaging Conceals Instability into "Fake Liquidity"
Traditional finance has long experienced this lesson. After the 2008 financial crisis, banks were forced to exit market-making, and market liquidity supply roles were taken over by ETFs, passive funds, and algorithmic trading. At that time, only 4% of the liquidity in the global MSCI World index was held by index funds; by 2018, this proportion had increased to 12%, and for specific stocks, it even exceeded 25%. What risks does this represent?
Even though ETFs or passive funds claim to have "good liquidity and ability to enter and exit at any time", the actual underlying holdings such as corporate bonds or secondary market bonds are difficult to dispose of during market fluctuations (insufficient liquidity).
(Understanding hedging is true stability! Unveiling the myth of index investment being risk-free, how can investors respond to the Taiwan Strait crisis?)
When funds rush out, market makers can only widen the bid-ask spread or simply exit the market, thereby triggering greater market turbulence.
This problem of "low-liquidity assets under liquidity packaging" is now quietly spreading in the crypto market.
Deep Illusion: The "False Depth" Dilemma in the Crypto Market
During the 2022 crypto bear market, even major exchanges experienced slippage, and the recent crash of Mantra's OM Token further highlighted the core issue: "The seemingly active trading depth instantly collapses under pressure."
Azizov pointed out that this phenomenon is particularly prevalent in Tier 2 Tokens ranking outside the top 20:
They are scattered across different exchanges with inconsistent quotes and market-making strategies, lacking overall depth. Moreover, many project teams and exchanges often create false market activity through wash trading and spoofing to attract users, further weakening real liquidity.
He is concerned that when volatility strikes, these fake liquidity providers will be the first to exit, leaving only helpless retail investors and a free-falling price.
Solving Fragmentation from the Protocol Layer: True Integration is the Way Out
The fundamental solution to liquidity fragmentation is not creating another faster exchange, but integrating cross-chain bridges and liquidity paths from the Layer 1 blockchain foundation:
Some new-generation L1 protocols have incorporated "asset liquidity" into their core design, enabling funds to move freely across chains through smart interoperability and unified liquidity pools, enhancing capital efficiency and trading stability.
With cloud communication architectures (AWS and Google Cloud) and automated trading occupying up to 90% of stablecoin trading volume, the technical infrastructure of the crypto market is ready. Once facilities are complete, the crypto market may truly possess capital market functions comparable to traditional finance.
Can the Crypto Market Break Free from Traditional Financial Cycles?
The future of the crypto market is not just about new technology, but a redesign of market structure and risk-bearing methods. To avoid repeating the liquidity defects of traditional finance, the crypto industry must see through the "surface prosperity" and build a deeper, truly connected financial infrastructure.
Risk Warning
Cryptocurrency investments carry high risks, with potentially significant price volatility. You may lose your entire principal. Please carefully assess the risks.
Abnormal Trading Causes Sharp Decline in ZKJ Price
According to the official account of Polyhedra @PolyhedraZK on the social platform X, the significant drop in ZKJ price was primarily due to a series of abnormal on-chain transactions between the ZKJ and KOGE trading pair. These operations occurred within an extremely short time, causing an impact on the market and leading to a rapid price decline. Currently, the official team has not disclosed the specific details of the transactions, but they have initiated an investigation and promised to provide an explanation to the public as soon as the situation is clarified.
Despite the short-term market volatility, Polyhedra stated that the project's technical architecture and long-term development direction remain unaffected. The statement noted: "We continue to steadily advance our construction according to plan and appreciate the firm support from the community." Polyhedra is currently closely monitoring the details of the related abnormal transactions and will publish more information after the investigation concludes. The community also calls on investors to avoid excessive panic and emotional trading before the official explanation is released.
Risk Warning
Cryptocurrency investment carries high risks, and its price may fluctuate dramatically. You may lose all of your principal. Please carefully assess the risks.
