From AMM to Order Book: Exploring the Transformation of Polymarket’s Pricing Mechanism and the Possibility of Integration with DEX

This article is machine translated
Show original

In Polymarket, each prediction market is essentially a "probability trading exchange for future events," where users can express their judgment about an event by buying a specific option (such as "Trump will win the 2024 US Presidential Election").

Because buying probability events differs from common trading, Polymarket's initial pricing and liquidity mechanism was also different from typical AMM algorithms. Polymarket's pricing mechanism has undergone massive changes from its initial version to now, first adopting an AMM mechanism to provide real-time liquidity and pricing, called the Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule, abbreviated as LMSR. This algorithm is currently also used by some other crypto protocols, such as Ethos.

Understanding the characteristics of LMSR can help comprehend Polymarket's pricing mechanism during most periods, the reasons why other protocols choose LMSR, and why Polymarket upgraded from LMSR to an off-chain order book.

LMSR's Characteristics and Pros and Cons

What is LMSR?

LMSR is a pricing mechanism specifically designed for prediction markets, allowing users to buy "shares" of an option based on their judgment, with the market automatically adjusting prices according to total demand. LMSR's most significant feature is: completing transactions without relying on counterparties, even if you are the first trader, the system can still price and execute the trade. This gives the prediction market "perpetual liquidity" similar to Uniswap.

In simple terms, LMSR is a cost function model that calculates prices based on the current "shares" held by users for different options. This mechanism ensures that prices always reflect the current market's expected probabilities for different event outcomes.

[The rest of the translation follows the same professional and precise approach, maintaining technical terminology and preserving the original structure and meaning.]

Paradigm Shift: Polymarket's Inevitable Logic of Abandoning LMSR

Based on the above analysis, LMSR is an efficient and practical tool during the platform's early stage with scarce liquidity. However, when Polymarket's user base and capital volume exceed the critical point, its design of sacrificing efficiency to obtain liquidity transforms from an advantage to a developmental constraint. Its migration to the order book model is based on the following strategic considerations:

  • Fundamental Demand for Capital Efficiency: LMSR requires market makers to provide liquidity across the entire price range from 0% to 100%, which leads to a large amount of capital being immobilized at price points with extremely low trading probabilities. The order book allows market makers and users to precisely concentrate liquidity in the most active price range, which highly aligns with professional market-making strategies.
  • Optimization of Trading Experience: The algorithmic nature of LMSR inevitably causes slippage for trades of any scale. For markets with increasingly thickening liquidity, this inherent trading friction would hinder the entry of large funds. Mature order book markets can absorb large orders through dense counterparty depth, providing lower slippage and a superior trading execution experience.
  • Strategic Need to Attract Professional Liquidity: The order book is the most universal and familiar market model for professional traders and market-making institutions. Shifting to an order book means Polymarket is sending a clear invitation signal to liquidity providers in the crypto world and traditional finance. This is a key step for the platform to move from attracting retail participants to building professional-level market depth.

Current Pricing and Liquidity Mechanism of Polymarket

Polymarket's upgrade is an inevitable choice after reaching a critical point in user scale and platform maturity. Behind this transformation is a systematic consideration of trading experience, gas costs, and market depth.

Hybrid Mode of On-chain Settlement and Off-chain Order Book

Polymarket's liquidity mechanism adopts a hybrid architecture combining on-chain and off-chain elements, aiming to balance the security of decentralized settlement with the smooth experience of centralized trading.

  • Off-chain Order Book: Users' limit orders are submitted and matched on off-chain servers, with instant operations and no gas costs. This makes Polymarket's trading experience similar to centralized exchanges, allowing users to intuitively see market depth from all limit orders. Liquidity thus directly comes from all trading participants, rather than passive liquidity pools.
  • On-chain Settlement: When buy and sell orders in the off-chain order book are successfully matched, the final asset transfer is executed through smart contracts on the Polygon chain. This "off-chain matching, on-chain settlement" mode preserves the flexibility of the order book while ensuring the finality of trading results and the immutability of asset ownership. The displayed "price" is the midpoint of the best buy and sell prices in the off-chain order book.

Underlying Logic of Price Anchoring - Share Minting and Arbitrage Cycle

For prediction markets, the core mechanism is how to ensure that the probabilities of "Yes" and "No" results always sum to 100% (i.e., "$1"). The order book model itself does not code-enforce order prices but uses an ingenious underlying asset design and arbitrage mechanism to leverage the market's own corrective force to ensure prices always converge to "$1".

(Translation continues in the same manner for the rest of the text)

Moreover, by linking the core metrics of DEX with Polymarket's event results, it is possible to create brand new structured financial products. The growth of the protocol needs to be deeply tied to community interests, and Polymarket provides a transparent and fair external verification mechanism. The protocol can design a "conditional" revenue distribution model: for example, allocating most of the transaction fees based on the event result of "whether the quarterly trading volume can exceed N billion dollars" on Polymarket. If the result is "yes", stakers share excess returns; if "no", the revenue is used for buyback and burning. This design transforms the protocol's KPIs into financial products that the community can directly participate in, constructing a more direct community of interests and value capture closed loop.

In summary, the combination of Polymarket and DEX is not a simple functional stacking, but a deep integration at the infrastructure level. Polymarket is evolving into a "risk pricing layer" and "information oracle" for the entire crypto industry. As the traffic brought by X gradually penetrates, its fusion with basic protocols like DEX will no longer be optional, but a key variable determining whether the future DeFi ecosystem can become more efficient, mature, and resilient.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments