Four differences between XHunt (@xhunt_ai) and Kaito: - XHunt covers rankings for everyone, while Kaito only tracks a smaller portion. - XHunt has a unique Soul Index to assess the content quality of KOLs. - XHunt has a unique Ability Model to assess the skill areas of KOLs. - Most importantly, XHunt serves KOLs and ordinary users, while Kaito serves project teams.

Kaito has two problems: first, it seems to only look at ICT interactions and not content; second, it has incentives, which inevitably lead to a large number of people getting stuck with the algorithm, creating a chaotic ecosystem. Phrases like "a bridge called BitVM" and "running nodes in a virtual machine" are just empty talk. There's also a lot of seemingly professional content that's actually just a bunch of AI-generated jargon and lacks depth. Xhunt has two core advantages: first, it recognizes content, although not perfectly accurately, it's generally acceptable; second, it identifies which areas of output from bloggers are of higher quality.

Strive to improve

🫶🫶🫶 I love you

After experiencing it, I found that it performs well in many aspects, the integration with Twitter is quite good, and Xhunt lowers the barrier to entry for ordinary people.

Thank you for your support, Brother Tu'ao. We will continue to serve you.