avatar
qinbafrank
81,740 Twitter followers
Follow
Investor in Crypto、TMT、AI ,跟踪最前沿科技趋势、野生宏观政经观察、研究全球资本流动性、周期趋势投资。记录个人学习和思考,经常出错常态掉坑爬坑。Runner🏃 Crypto入口OKX就够了:https://web3.okx.com/zh-hans/web3
Posts
avatar
qinbafrank
23 minutes ago
Regarding today's second round of US-China consultations in London, after the mid-May Geneva talks, the US continues to restrict chips to China, while China implements rare earth export controls, forming a "Rare Earth vs. Chips" game scenario. In this second round of consultations, US Commerce Secretary Raimondo is participating, which may indicate that technology export controls "may no longer be a non-negotiable area" (this area falls under Raimondo's jurisdiction). Both sides have urgency in this second round of consultations: 1. The US is about to run out of rare earths, with reports showing US car companies recently complaining about rare earth magnet shortages threatening factory shutdowns, and the US's only operating rare earth mine in California's Mountain Pass having to export rare earths to China for refinement. 2. While China still faces chip control challenges, the import and export slowdown caused by tariffs is even more critical: 1) Mainly due to dragging exports to the US. May exports to the US year-on-year were -34.5%, further expanding from the previous -21.0%. 2) China's May import and export growth of 4.8% year-on-year is not low; but slightly lower than Q1's 5.7% and April's 8.1%, with a month-on-month decline below the historical seasonal level, showing initial impacts of tariff and trade environment uncertainty. In this situation, both sides have motivations and urgency to negotiate. The possibility of reaching a further agreement in this second round of consultations is high. The final result ultimately depends on: How much room is there for further tariff rate reduction? The extent of chip and rare earth control relaxation by both sides (such as opening under quota systems or usage restrictions)? <HT>twitter.com/qinbafrank/status/...</HT>
avatar
qinbafrank
2 days ago
Owen mentioned a good point: Trump and Bassent will start to leverage yield curve control with an active monetary policy. I understand the logic here is that at the beginning of his term, Trump's policy of imposing external tariffs and internal efficiency reforms, layoffs, and cost-cutting aimed to increase revenue and reduce expenses. The intention and starting point were actually not problematic, but the policy implementation pace was completely out of control and ultimately ineffective, creating massive shock waves. In this situation, the shift from a contractionary policy to an expansionary policy. Although tax cuts and deregulation were the earliest campaign promises, a closer look at the details of the bill suggests that the intensity should exceed Trump's initial expectations. If the new route encounters problems, then return to the old path. Against the background of tax cuts and significantly raising the debt ceiling, controlling the yield curve and curbing the rise of long-term bond yields becomes crucial. After all, only by suppressing long-term bond yields can future bond issuance costs be reduced and debt burden lowered. However, Powell is not cooperative, so they plan to determine the next Federal Reserve chair within the remaining 11 months of Powell's term, hoping to reduce Powell's market influence through this "shadow chair" arrangement. The subsequent game between Trump, Bassent, and Powell is worth watching. Personally, I believe that in the short term, the "shadow Fed chair" cannot yet sway the market or hedge Powell's influence, given there's still nearly a year left and the market cannot react so early. However, as Powell's term shortens, the shadow chair's voice will grow increasingly significant. My expectation is that as time passes, when Powell's term is only half a year or even shorter, the "shadow Fed chair's" power will become increasingly strong, at which point the market may no longer focus on what Powell says. Simply put, Powell's attitude will carry more weight in the next half year, and thereafter, the "shadow Fed chair's" attitude will have greater influence. twitter.com/qinbafrank/status/...
loading indicator
Loading..