avatar
tun.btc🎒
6,339 Twitter followers
Follow
IQ 50 Fool,buy in $SOL all 🎒https://backpack.exchange/join/tun
Posts
avatar
tun.btc🎒
Thread
BNB is a debt, not an asset, representing historical credit redemption, with no value anchor (if there were one, it would be the ability to harvest air coins). It is merely a platform's credit debt. Binance Alpha is a debt issuance and conversion tool, not a wealth creation opportunity. Alpha points are a centralized accounting virtual points, an "BNB" that is not on-chain. The core value lies in two points: 1. Stratifying various project parties in the market, countering Solana's model of issuing on-chain, creating bubbles on-chain, and cashing out on CEX, draining user assets on CEX. This is why they first launch perps with an alpha label, then introduce IDO mode to hierarchically manage projects, facilitating better exploitation and taxation, and better controlling capital flow velocity. It is said that projects listed on spot require buying 5 million BNB to be locked for half a year, which is likely a way of not charging listing fees but collecting rent through other means. 2. Taking away the benefits of BNB holders, distributing part to the market, and guiding the market to not only hold and trade BNB, but also increase capital flow velocity, even if it's a false prosperity. It seems like fighting the rich to help the poor, with the central authority weakening local gentry, but in reality, it's a re-centralization of power above rules and systems, making project parties and users directly pay for old debts. Binance Alpha is a structured exploitation. It artificially creates internal competition and stratification between project parties and users, making everyone pay tribute to BNB and Binance itself, yet never touching real assets like BTC. Understanding Binance's essence and the leadership's cash-out needs, in this cycle, Binance is not a financial technology platform, but a hub for debt transfer. BNB's market value is merely the scale of liabilities, and Alpha is the latest debt transfer device. Binance's entrepreneurial journey ended long ago, and the debt conversion path began with the leadership's release from prison.
avatar
tun.btc🎒
VC investors are born to be prophets and futurists, with their predictions measured on a 10-year scale. This is especially true for early-stage investments. To achieve massive returns, unless the rate of technological change suddenly accelerates, such as during the mobile internet era of 11-14 or the AI era after 22, it's difficult to expect a successful IPO within 5 years of the first investment round. I can think of a few cases of rapid IPO and massive returns after investment: Jumei, Momo, Bawang Tea Ji, Pinduoduo - all went public in about 3-4 years after investment. Bubble took 7 years from the first investment to going public, and after 13 years, it has become a global sensation; Ximalaya took 13 years from startup to being acquired for billions of dollars; Insta360 took 12 years from the first investment to going public; Mihayou went through an 11-year cycle from first investment to exit; Diezhi took 12 years to reach a billion-dollar scale. Even excluding the past few years, these companies have all gone through a real ten-year journey. Such examples could be told for three days and nights. Ten years is so long! The world can completely transform, industries can be reshaped, target audiences can be updated, and even the founding team's state and relationships can change repeatedly. So how can one break through in this constantly changing landscape? The only option is to find things that can transcend cycles. Such as the most fundamental aspects of human nature. Like the standards for success in the business world. Or what you believe the world will look like in ten years. Early-stage investment's massive returns: accurately judging people, having the right imagination, and being able to wait. Most investors have incorrect imaginations about the future and cannot afford to wait. Judging people, however, is the easiest part, and most can do it correctly.
avatar
tun.btc🎒
06-14
Thread
First, I point out that your core error is estimating the airdrop by treating Backpack as an ordinary project/crypto exchange. Second, I point out that you have overlooked the personal political energy of founders like Armani Can, and the urgent market need for a new CEX (non-Binance). Third, I point out that you have ignored that Backpack is a technical product shell, with compliant capital as flesh, geopolitics as soul, disguised as a CEX, and a major channel in the crypto market. What is feared is not giving airdrops to retail investors, but that you haven't gotten on board. Simply put, Backpack is not an independent CEX, but a cooperation body for multi-national capital power arbitrage. Possessing political neutrality, it is a typical geopolitical structural exchange sample, though currently lacking a sustainable commercial closed loop (revenue dependent on activity-driven), but the non-consensus here is the true source of odds and winning rates. It cannot be compared with market-maker-originated exchanges driven by products. What is compliance? Compliance is monopoly, and monopoly represents that I can do what you cannot - a violent rent-seeking of power. This is an emerging form of a new type of crypto exchange not yet recognized by the market, more like a political capital experiment with power structure preceding platform implementation. You ask me what innovation is? Is it copying and replicating what others do on BSC? Backpack will reconnect the legs that FTX broke. That is innovation!
loading indicator
Loading..